- Sometime surgeons suggest to extract some of the patient’s blood a few weeks before the surgery. When needed it can then be used during the surgery. This is sometimes called an autotransfusion.
- This has the advantage that it cannot be contaminated by another one’s diseases and doesn’t cause rejection symptoms
- Still, this treatment is unacceptable to the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Why?
- The scripture in Leviticus is specifically about hunting (Lev 17:13)
- The scripture in Deuteronomy is specifically about killing an animal for eating or as a sacrifice (Deut 12:15,16; 15:23)
- When someone’s own blood is transfused, no animal or human is killed: hence there is no life to be given back to God
- But even then: the laws of Moses are abolished
- This is recognised in the above mentioned Watchtower. Yet, this law is somehow still considered in force, whereas other laws not (like stoning to death, that the hair on the side of the head could not be shaved, or the field cannot be reaped to the edge). No biblical reason is given.
- On the other hand, some treatments that are similar are said to be a matter of conscience.
- The Governing Body allows taking blood fractions. Yet they come from collecting, storing and then partially transfusing
Treatment | Extracted | Stored | Given back | Poured out | Acceptable ? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autotransfusion | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Blood work | Yes | Yes | No | possible | Yes |
Blood tagging | Yee | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Are all Bible laws still valid when a life is in danger ?

What is more important: life, or its symbol: blood ?

Sometimes it was allowed to eat an animal with its blood still in it. This could help a hunter to stay alive if he didn’t catch anything else.
